{"id":9368,"date":"2021-05-24T10:37:58","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T07:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esatoshi.club\/?p=9368"},"modified":"2021-05-24T22:12:03","modified_gmt":"2021-05-24T19:12:03","slug":"ama-satoshi-club-x-launchx-may-23rd-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/2021\/05\/24\/ama-satoshi-club-x-launchx-may-23rd-2\/","title":{"rendered":"AMA Satoshi Club x LaunchX, May 23rd"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We were delighted to welcome our guests from LaunchX. The AMA took place on May 23rd, 2021 and our guests were  @MeSoApey and @kingslayar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The total reward pool was 500$ and\nwas divided into three parts. In this AMA Recap we will try to summarize some\nof the most interesting points for you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2><strong>Part 1 \u2014\nintroduction&nbsp;and&nbsp;questions from the\nTelegram&amp;Bitcointalk&nbsp;community<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>D. \u041f\u0430\u043f\u0430\n\u0420\u043e\u0443\u0447: <\/strong>hello Satoshi Club! it&#8217;s time for AMA!&#x1f973; today we\nhaving AMA with LaunchX!&nbsp; and our guests\n&#8211; @MeSoApey and @kingslayar ! we are ready! &#x1f604; hello!\nwelcome! how are you doing? are you ready for AMA?! &#x1f60a;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Hello Everyone,\nthanks for having us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>D. <\/strong><strong>\u041f\u0430\u043f\u0430<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><strong>\u0420\u043e\u0443\u0447<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>EPIC! thank\nyou guys for joining us today! so let&#8217;s star our AMA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>D. \u041f\u0430\u043f\u0430\n\u0420\u043e\u0443\u0447: <\/strong>as always introduction first &#x1f609; so please introduce\nyourselves and your project &#x1f607;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Sure. I am part of the operations and communications team for LaunchX.\nHave been in the space for close to 10 years now. Back ground in computer\nprogramming. Happy to be hear to share the good word about LaunchX!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Hello!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Welcome here &#x1f600;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Quick\nrecap for anyone that isn&#8217;t aware. LaunchX project is a Dao that consists of 3\ncompanies that operate a fund, incubation and tech build capabilities. We also\nhave an advisory board that consists of many other companies that have well\ndeveloped business infrastructure. It&#8217;s why during periods of market conditions\nlike were seeing today allows us to keep building<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>When did you start to develop LaunccX?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>LaunchX has had several iterations but the founding members concepted\nLaunchX back in February. With early ideation ambitions that bleed into Q4\n2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Gotcha! You had time to develop!&#x1f603;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>D. \u041f\u0430\u043f\u0430\n\u0420\u043e\u0443\u0447: <\/strong>could you share info about your team? who&#8217;s behind LaunchX?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Sure its first important to note that LaunchX is a decentralized Dao. Its\nfounded by the core Ecosystem Dao which is made up of Marshland Capital, Magnus\nCapital, and Valaren Capital(Traditional firm\/Dev Arm). Marshland and Magnus\nare both industry veterans in the capital start up space when it comes to\ncrypto.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Super!&nbsp; Really\ngreat founders!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Just to\nadd to this question. It in essence means that the core team of LaunchX\nconsists of all the combined resources and personnel talent that all three of\nthese companies have. Its a very big team of people<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Guys! Thank you for your intro! Are you ready to\nstart with the questions from our community?&#x1f603;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q1 from Telegram user&nbsp;&nbsp; @belkysgonzalez<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>It seems that you have a strong partnership with\nKuCoin after the successful BurningDrop launch. Can you tell us about your\nexperience with the KuCoin team and how has LaunchX benefitted from this\npartnership? And after the BurningDrop, what is the next step? Can we expect\nmore news about LaunchX and KuCoin working together again?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Sure. Our connection with KuCoin actually stems from our strategic\nrelationship with DaoMaker. The funds that founded the Dao actually have longer\nroots with DaoMaker dating back to 2018\/2019 and into their strategic sale.\nHatus view on the industry as it pertains to VCs that provide minimal value\nalong with tokenomic belief of tight price levels between rounds help to\nstabilize our relationship to want to see each other succeed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Between DaoMaker and KuCoin they both saw the vision and need to bring a\ncommunity focused launch pad, with lower fees, and non profit in terms of\nvaults. With the solid team backing the project like Marshland, Magnus, and\nValaren they were able to make the judgement that we were for real. Infact only\na hand full of launch pads have been blessed with tier 1 liquidity so we are\nhappy to be a part of the KuCoin family.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We are in conversations with them about next step as it pertains to\ntrading competitions and our relationship with DaoMaker is stronger than ever\nas we are being introduced to some amazing partnership\/integration\nopportunities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>It seems you have a lot of partnerships in\ncryptospace, do you plan to launch on another exchanges? Or Kucoin is enough\nfor now?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Right now KuCoin and Pancake is more than enough liquidity for the short\nterm. Our primary focus over the next quarter is building, providing value, and\nbuilding the community so that the flow of ideas are coming from everyone. We\ndo have aspirations for other exchanges but it is not the top priority at this\ntime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>That&#8217;s clear! We will follow your next steps&#x1f44f; Thank you\nfor your answers! Ready to proceed?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q2 from Telegram user @victorogb<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>As a decentralized launchpad for projects, LaunchX\nis said to be community-driven, governance-based, and transparent, with the\ncommunity at the helm of affairs as it concerns projects for consideration and\npossible launch on the platform. These privilege are available to community\nmembers as a result of the LaunchX DAO protocol. With the DAO protocol\n(described as a first of it\u2019s kind), do all community members have a certain\nlevel of governance privileges or is there a specially selected governance\nteam, and how will the DAO protocol effectively ensure that prospective\nprojects are given the fairest community backed consideration?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Good question. The way the governance process works at least as it\npertains to projects listing on the platform. A project applies and is given a\nback ground check. If they pass initial back ground check we help them in\nposting the soft proposal. This is a warm temperature check 50\/50 up and down\nvote. This is also a good time to refine the proposal with feedback from the\ncommunity. From here an onchain governance vote is performed via token holders\nfor the official listing. The Ecosystem Daos only power is to execute the will\nof the people but also has veto power in the case something that would damage\nthe ecosystem has come arise or manipulation occurs. This is a check and\nbalance system that is required to protect the integrity of the ecosystem but\nideally would never be used as the governance threshold would be high enough to\nprevent manipulation. We think a good number is 30 to 40%. Something that will\nbe discussed on the forums which go live Monday i would imagine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Governance members will also be invited into discussion as it pertains to\nour listing vaults regarding different strategies we want to deploy the listing\nfees into and how much of the listing fees should be reinvested into the\ndevelopment costs of the company. This can be determined on a per project basis\nor a flat fee to make things simple. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other development roadmap goals external to the initial roadmap and\nprogress on the current roadmap are always up for discussion and any soft vote\nthat passes community approval is eligible for a hard vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Is your governance system already live?&#x1f603;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>It should be ready for deployment Monday im told from our development\nteam.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>So next 24 to 48 hours basically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From there we plan to have many discussions including, what is most asked\nabout, is delegation tiers for IDO staking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Wow! What users need to start voting?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>The long\nterm plan is for a fully community governed project. Like all successful\ncommunity driven projects you need to have a period of transition so support\nthe process of adoption. We created this structure to enable community\nengagement and involvement so that those most engaged are rewarded as they\nengage in the utility functions we will build<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>To participate in warm up and down votes(Soft votes) its a simple forum\nvote but to participate in on chain votes you must have tokens and they will most\nlikely need to be delegated to prevent people from buying tokens for a specific\nvote and voting day of. Basically security check to make sure you delegated\nprior to a vote going live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Which is minimum amount of tokens user need to have\nto participate in governance? I mean chain votes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>We would\nencourage anyone keen to understand more to read our recent update medium\narticle that give more information on how those community members that hold\ntokens will be able to engage with our platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>That is something still in discussion and we will look for community\ninput once forums go live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Gotcha &#x1f44d; Ideally there is no\nmin. From our perspective but this is an inclusive process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>We understand &#x1f603; Btw, you\ncan share this article with our community &#x1f609;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Sure you can read our community update article that details part of our\nroadmap and things we are actively working on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/launchx.medium.com\/launchx-community-update-f41df3b35a16\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Thank you for your answers! Ready to go to the next\nquestion?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>We sense\nthat its important to be inclusive so most likely anyone with even the most\nminimum of token will have some ability to get involved. We will almost\ncertainly consider a tiered system and offer more utility for holders that have\nmore engagement with LaunchX. Pretty standard structure with any normal\nbusiness operations<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q3 from Telegram user @Josegamboac<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Launchx, as described in its medium, plans to launch\nthe following projects: JustLaunchX, LaunchX +, LaunchX Studios. Can you\nbriefly tell us about each of them?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Sure. So its important that LaunchX can provide value full scope to\nprojects that want to enter our ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Just Launch X is for projects that are only looking to launch on the\nplatform and connect with our community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some projects on the other hand are looking for incubation level support.\nSince Marshland and Magnus are notable funds and have incubation arms for\nprojects we have launched we open up the ability for projects to enter into\nthese pipelines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LaunchX plus is a crypto focused vertical where Magnus and Marshland\noffer the option to come into our advisory arm and make sure the project has\nthe resources it needs to take it to the next level. This includes full stack\ngo to market services and access to our network with major players like DaoMaker,\nKuCoin, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LaunchX Studio is a much bigger pond. We are currently in talks with\nmajor international incubators who are looking to make a splash into crypto.\nThese incubation arms work very closely with major players like YCombinator,\nTechstars, and Andreessen Horowitz. This avenue is better suited for projects\nwho can scale beyond blockchain and into the traditional space.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The goal is to mold LaunchX&#8217;s USP into more than just a place people\nlaunch their project prior to AMM but a spring board for professional\nbusinesses that have ambitions to make profound impact. Not all projects are\neligible for this package because there is a high level of scrutiny when you\nare dealing with major players such as this. There are other things to mention\nin these tiers but i think its enough to get people aquatinted with the\nprocess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Great\nquestion and this really should clarify any concerns anyone might have about\nthe legitimacy or long term aspirations this project has. We are going to be\nannouncing over the next few days, weeks and months a steady flow of\npartnerships that relate to how we will continue to expand our infrastructure\nand in turn build value for our community. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This forms part of a 5-10 year plan of building a framework of linked\ninfrastructure that will support and co-exist to build greater value and\nincreased capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>So, as i understand you just planning all this or\nalready find projects which want to participate in one of this projects?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Could you maybe rephrase this question Mary?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Let&#8217;s say, do you have projects which are going to\nparicipate in LaunchX Studio incubation program?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Between Marshland and Magnus we deal with over 30 projects a month.\nMarshland specifically is actively advising or incubating 5 top tier projects\nat a time as well. So yes there are&nbsp;\nprojects in the pipeline atm that are looking to come into the LaunchX\necosystem over the next 60 days. That being said each one still has to be pass\na governance vote to list. Projects that have our backing obviously come with a\nboost of confidence though.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Gotcha! I see you will have tones of upcoming\nevents!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>To\nelaborate a little further on where we plan to take this. Imagine the future\nwhere we are seeing traditional capital inflows that desire more open\ngovernance and transparency. We see a day when the community runs its own\nprojects and launchpads and exchanges and benefits from the utility that\nprovides. Oh and shares in the value that this creates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry Satoshi\nCLUB: <\/strong>That&#8217;s our main goals in crypto!&#x1f603; Community trust and\nsupport costs a lot!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Yes the traditional markets main concern is regulatory compliance. SEC\nframeworks like those submitted by Hester Pierce regarding Safe Harbor 2.0\nposition LaunchX above its competitors by offering a truly decentralized,\ngovernance driven, community\/process. This has opened up many doors with\ntraditional partners who have alot of opportunity coming external into\nblockchain and strategic partners who want to tap into crypto into more\ntraditional vertical. The future is bright for LaunchX!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>It sounds like a dream which becomes true!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/news\/public-statement\/peirce-statement-token-safe-harbor-proposal-2.0\">https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/news\/public-statement\/peirce-statement-token-safe-harbor-proposal-2.0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Can read more about Safe Harbor 2.0 here and how powerful it will be for\nfuture start ups in the decentralized markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>It&#8217;s very interesting long read! Thank you for\nsharing!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ready to jump to the next question?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q4 from Telegram user&nbsp; @brotherhaikal<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>There is a coordinated FUD lead by former admin of\nLaunchX main chat (Paul), the FUD is consist on this project build by team of\nserial scammer that has rugged so many project before and the VC backing is\nfake, Will you try to explain this clearly to the community?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Its worth\nclarifying we&#8217;ve been engaged in the traditional fund and incubation space for\nnearly 20 years and our partnerships are with some of the biggest and brightest\nfintech, AI, Quantum computing businesses from Silicon Valley. They want to\npartner with us to bring the brightest minds and project to the blockchain\nspace with us at LaunchX and we will take the best to them. Its a full cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>As i know, and it&#8217;s a sad thing &#8211; a lot of projects\nhave fud attacks<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Our community admin James had mentioned something about this but this is\nnot the case. Marshland, Magnus have both been vocal in support via Social\nMedia as well as other key backers like x21 etc which i believe our admins have\nshown in the chat. I would say KuCoin would not list a project that had fake\nbacking same with DaoMaker. We are close friends with Hatu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>I think it&#8217;s important that you&#8217;re opened and ready\nto answer such kind of questions &#x1f603;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>The simple\nanswer is to state that in order to get listed on Kucoin you need to have a\nfull DD on the people behind LaunchX, you need a Legal Opinion. We have a full\ntime lawyer that is part of the Advisory Board. Its a pretty ridiculous\naccusation to be honest<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>May be someone wants cheap tokens?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>I hope guys will be pleased with your answers &#x1f609;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>by the way\nwe gave away 50k worth of tokens as part of our public sale in an airdrop. I\nwould imagine a scammer wouldn&#8217;t do that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>That&#8217;s true&#x1f603;&#x1f680;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q5 from Telegram user&nbsp;&nbsp; @yellowchamp<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>LaunchX is a true community focused launchpad. The\nmajority of fees generated via project launches will be deposited into our\nspecialized staking vaults and leveraged into passive APY strategies. Can you\nexplain how does specialized staking vaults works? What makes it unique and\nspecial? Can you share to us some of the strategies that your LaunchX is\noffering to community,traders and investors to get a passive APY throughout the\nyear? Thank you<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Sure,\nsimply put when we onboard a project we will take most of that fee and deploy\nit into staking vaults. If you hold LaunchX tokens you will have the ability to\nearn passive APY.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Approximately how many projects do you plan to\nonboard, let&#8217;s say, per month? Have you set goals of this kind?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Yes the unique thing about the APY Vaults is that when a project comes to\nlist on the LaunchX they pay a fee just like any other launch pad. The\ndifference here is that instead of a centralized party taking the money instead\na small portion is put back into the development fund. The rest is deployed\ninto a vault which is then deployed into different DeFi strategies. For example\nAave for starts. The goal will be that the governance can create new strategies\nor choose where they want the vaults to be deployed. The more projects that\nlist the more the vault expands and the more yield can be generated via the two\nweek delegation cycles for the staking pools. Its a very unique solution that\nonly we can offer because we are&nbsp;\ndecentralized governance and there is no profiteer from this system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>We will obv start out slow and scale up as we grow. This is similar with\nmost launch pad models. The USPs we have mentioned prior we think will\nencourage projects to join more professional organizations like LaunchX.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>We don&#8217;t\nhave a set plan for volume. This is more about quality than quantity. As we\nscale so will the volume<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>How much you will charge from projects to launch on\nLaunchX?&#x1f603;Super! Which requirements you will have for the\nprojects?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>We want to get community feedback if it should be done a project by\nproject basis in the warm temperature check or if it should be a flat rate. We\nhave a number in mind but would prefer to keep it internal until community\ndiscussion is had so not to impact opinions and also keep it out of the hands\nof our competitors. I will say by having overhead minimal from a decentralized\nstructure we are able to lower the fee structure so most launchpads couldn&#8217;t\neven touch it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This will be very important because we are heading into&nbsp; future where projects will want to launch on\nmulti pad strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Nice strategy &#x1f44d; Thank you\nfor your answers, guys!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u041c\u0430ry\nSatoshi CLUB: <\/strong>Ready for the 6th and last question from this part?&#x1f603;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>sure<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q6 from Telegram user&nbsp;&nbsp; @kimterbear<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Talking about fair launch like you stated on your Twitter\nbio, do you implement anti-whale system since whales are one of the major\nproblems in blockchains as they massively affect a token\u2019s value. Do you set a\nlimitation into how many a user can only hold in maximum for every projects\nlaunched in LaunchX? How protected are the projects launched here?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:\n<\/strong>Anti Whale systems are more focused on presale and post AMM listing. When\nwe work with projects more intimately we have more control over captables to\nmake sure its more distributed and with players who we know are holders and\ncontribute value not day 1 dumpers. With AMM stuff we do have resources for\nsniper protection etc but its not really our focused. We are more of a\nsupporting ecosystem and inject our selves on the LaunchX side at point of\nentry so we don&#8217;t have control over this stuff at times. It is part of our DD\ncheck but we work with projects in a fair and honest conversation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Just to\nadd to this. We followed a very extensive process ourselves in order to get\nlisted on Kucoin and partner with DaoMaker. Such as audits, legal opinions,\nfull disclosure of backers etc etc. We will do the same for projects that wish\nto launch with us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2>Part 2 \u2014 live questions from\nthe Telegram community<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q1 from Telegram User @Medo1234568<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Do you have any plans to attract non ,,,crypto investors to your project Because it is the success of a project to get more investors who are still not in the crypto world. What are the plans to increase awareness around your in non-crypto space?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>Yes this is why we are partnering with incubators and funds external to crypto. They want us to partner for more traditional finance options and we are equipped to facilitate .<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>We have some core partnerships in the silicon valley fintech, merchant banking and tech spaces. We will defo have cross sector support<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q2 from Telegram User @My1queen<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>With LAUNCH X B2B ecosystem aimed for startups and small businesses to raise Capital with multiple blockchains. How will this be implemented and what measures are in place to check for fake and duplicated business?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>As mentioned we live have a very comprehensive process to confirm that projects are high quality and valid. They will need to have full audits. legal opinions, substantial development and legitimate teams. Ultimate they must pass the would a top tier exchange list them. Thats the standard were looking for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q3 from Telegram User @Steffiiigray5<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Can you tell us about the road map, how it is progressing and the results of your project so far? Then what are the obstacles?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>First 30 days<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Get governance portal live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Get community feedback and implement tiered systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Refactor admin portal issues and small bugs not addressed pre launch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Implement vault and staking system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Integrate Huobi Eco launches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First 60 days<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Solana Integration<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Q3\/Q4<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Dot integration<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014Crosschain bridges integrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q4 from Telegram User @imwiiw27<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>About the community governance of LaunchX, Community members holding $LNCHX tokens can actively vote for those projects that apply. And If the vote gets passed by the majority, an official proposal is submitted. Can you please tell us are there any benefits, reward or incentive if you propasal passed?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>Good idea will talk with the team about this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q5 from Telegram User @Antoni_azx<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Your token $ LNCHX is now live on KuCoin, PancakeSwap and DEXTools, are these the only way to buy it? Also, can you tell us the main benefits of being a $ LNCHX holder? Specially for IDO and exclusive investment project participation?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>Yes these are the primary ways to acquire governance tokens. Primary usage is access to IDOs, Governance participation, staking for yield from vault strategies. There will also be some NFT aspects incorporated with our integration partner which is also first 60 days of the roadmap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q6 from Telegram User @Rayian3<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Mostly all the Crypto is in dump recently by market crash. How does your project ensure that the coin will recover after dump?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>David: <\/strong>Well, we see this market as a very early stage still. We have been involved in capital markets for 2o years or more. Crypto for a number of market cycles. We don&#8217;t get too focused on the daily noise<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q7 from Telegram User @shanto016<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Many projects rug pulled and exit scam recently. Why should investors trust your project not to do the same?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>Our project is backed by major funds in the space including the incubation DAO. It also has gone through extensive DD by a centralized exchange which requires SEC lawyer opinions etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Q8 from Telegram User @Medo1234568<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>I have seen many projects recently appeared, and they died because of lack of liquidity and confidence in developers. How do you convince investors about this problem?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>Well liquidity is checked off as we have a CEX and a DEX. The latter is done by active community engagement and building. Full stop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q9 from Telegram User @highpee<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>You will offer startup and incubator service for new projects. If a project wish to get started, how will they go about it in order to get onboarded? What is the application process and what are the basic conditions that a project should meet before they are accepted on your platform?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey: <\/strong>There is an application form on our website. This is the first step. Projects are more than welcome to apply directly when forums are live as well but we help assist them in the process if they apply directly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Q10 from Telegram User @Indomiekuy<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>As we know crypto world is growing and there are much new launchpad project out there. can you describe what are the specialty from LaunchX than other competitor?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MeSoApey:<\/strong> I don&#8217;t know any other launch pad that is offering access for select projects to international partners who work strategically with big names like YCombinator, Techstars, and A16z. For starters. Even then we are a true community first launch pad with a scaling staking system. Very unique and unmatched imo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2><strong>Part&nbsp;3&nbsp;\u2013 Quiz\nResults<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In the final part we tested your knowledge in terms of LaunchX. They\u2019ve prepared 4 questions for this part. The total reward pool for quiz was 300$.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For more information and\nfuture AMAs, join our Social Media channels:<\/strong><br>\nEnglish Telegram group:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/Satoshi_club\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/t.me\/Satoshi_club<\/a><br>\nRussian Telegram group:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_ru\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_ru<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spanish Telegram group:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_spanish\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_spanish<\/a><br>\nTelegram Channel:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_channel\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/t.me\/satoshi_club_channel<\/a><br>\nTwitter:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realsatoshiclub\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/twitter.com\/realsatoshiclub<\/a><br>\nWebsite:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/esatoshi.club\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/esatoshi.club\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Our partners:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> LaunchX Website \u2013&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/launchx.finance\/\">launchx.finance<\/a><br>LaunchX Telegram \u2013&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/weLaunchX\">@weLaunchX<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We were delighted to welcome our guests from LaunchX. The AMA took place on May 23rd, 2021 and our guests were @MeSoApey and @kingslayar. The total reward pool was 500$ and was divided into three parts. In this AMA Recap we will try to summarize some of the most interesting points for you. Part 1 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":9369,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9368"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9368"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9406,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9368\/revisions\/9406"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/satoshi-club.esipick.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}