We are pleased to announce our next AMA on October 28th 2021 at 11:00 AM UTC Time: Satoshi Club x Unireview
⚠️Click to see the hour
⚠️Total Reward pool: $500
⚠️Requirements:
👉 Join Satoshi Club Telegram group
👉 Join Unireview Telegram group
We will have the following structure:
Part 1: 100$ /6 users – We’ll select 6 questions from the community. A user can post maximum 3 questions.
Part 2: 100$/10 users – Open chat for 120 seconds. You can post Max 3 questions. Unireview Team will select 10 questions and answer them.
Part 3: 300$ – A quiz about Unireview
For more details:
Unireview Website – info.unireview.io
Unireview Telegram – @unireview
Satoshi Club – @satoshi_club
Russian – @satoshi_club_ru
Spanish – @satoshi_club_spanish
Does #UREV have an ambassador program for plans to become a global project or just a few countries or locales and is there an airdrop on #UREV for the community?
Southeast Asia is a very vibrant market and many project developed here so with #UREV project what do you think about Southeast Asia and do you have any plan to develop here?
Partners are very important for every project today, may I know which partners #UREV have now? and which partners in the future #UREV will be heading to ?
Reward tiers – according to the information made available on your telegram channel, we understand tiers are defined by the amount of UREV tokens held in the users Wallet, which in turn determines the rewards within each tier. How could UREV TOKENS be gotten? Would there be any public offer or pre sell? And when exactly would this be?
If a certain user wishes to express his/her opinion about a certain cryptocurrency and make a review out of it, is it required for that specific user to have a some sort of eligibility status or validation for Unireview to credit and accept the review? Do you require any credentials from the reviewer before you feature their works?
Given that the majority of review and rating posts within your platform will include crypto-related products, does Unireview allows Ponzi schemes, scams and projects with pump and dump schemes, and impulsive financial advise posts in the social platform? What are your policies towards these kind of post and how does Unireview regulate this kind of matter?
Most review and rating platforms we see today can manipulate the contents within their respective platforms and media. They have the power to control the review articles and posts that they think may impose conflicts among their platform’s interests. How will Unireview solve this kind of issue? Is your review and rating platform free from centralized authority? Do Unireview have any means of taking down a certain post/review, whenever it chooses to?
UNIREVIEW is a platform which will rewards the crypto enthusiasts who review about various cryptocurrencies. Currently there are many crypto enthusiasts who post their reviews and best suggestions for tokens to invest and etc., Still it is hard to get users to a platform like UNIREVIEW. So, beside rewarding the reviewers will there be any kind of community giveaways, airdrops to create a hype in the cryptospace regarding your project and attract users towards your platform? What type of marketing campaigns will UNIREVIEW undergo to make it’s first step or to create a hype in the market in its earlier stage? Currently have you planned, how to utilize the 15% of your token supply which is for marketing? If so, could you please share it with us.
Thank you.
Hello, Is there any options/possibilities for the users of UNIREVIEW to pick the one who upload fake reviews and warn them? How do you assure that there won’t be any unnesscceary fradulant activities or scam would occur in your platform who post their fake reviews? So, will there be any KYC verifications for the users before they post their reviews in your platform? And, where they need to post their reviews wheather in your community or any app will be optimized for your users? Lastly, on what criteria will UNIREVIEW reward its reviewers ? Will that be considered upon the updated or how? Thank you.
You did mention that Reviews posted on the platform will receive an up vote or down vote which reflect the relevancy of the information provided by any reviewer determing their user reputation. Could you please tell us, are there any particular kind of Post or information expected on your ecosystem? Who are the persons in charge of the Reviews under your block chain?
You have mentioned that 97% of the people trust social reviews before investing. Your whole project is based on this argument. Nevertheless, we all know that some projects pay for reviews and users write social reviews just to receive payments. Because of that, a lot of people are currently not willing to trust social reviews. My question is, how did you find that 97% of the people trust social reviews? Did you conduct any research? Don’t you think that the importance of your project may decrease when more people hesitate to trust the things on social media due to paid reviews?
According to your user rankings and badges, users will be ranked according to their involvement on Unireview. I noticed that your badges are based on the number of reviews. For example, you offer 10 UREV for 100 reviews and 80 UREV for 1000 reviews. Don’t you consider the quality in addition to the quantity? Users may publish simple/spam/duplicate reviews just to earn badges. A single user can post “This is a good product” 1000 times and earn 80 UREV. What is your policy regarding this type of actions? Is there someone in your team to monitor the reviews before offering the badges?
Explaining the reputation system, you have mentioned “reviews posted on the platform will receive an upvote or downvote which reflects the relevancy of the information provided by any reviewer determining their user reputation.” Who has the right to upvote/downvote the reviews? If the community has that right, users can easily upvote their reviews and downvote others’ reviews using multiple accounts. How do you prevent that kind of spam activities?
I read that Unireview is a decentralized reviews and rating platform where we can earn rewards for reviewing our favorite cryptocurrency. According to what I understood, users get rewarded for reviewing cryptocurrencies in Unireview tokens. How many reviews must we do in order to start receiving those rewards? Will we receive them immediately after each review or do we have to wait a certain time? Is there a limit of reviews that we can do per day?
You mentioned in an article that with BSC it is necessary to create a bridge between BSC and Ethereum, while Polygon already has a bridge with Ethereum, which makes the experience and functionality perfect for both the project and the investors. How will they make sure that the demands on the network are already high (which requires new tools)? What tools are in development according to your roadmap?
Hello Unireview team. I was checking your group on Telegram and I noticed that users cannot write and send messages. Why is the option to send messages restricted? Where can users send their questions and concerns regarding Unireview? Where can we share our feedback and suggestions with the Unireview team? Have you considered allowing users to post messages in the group soon? Thank you so much!
I read that your project has a different review mechanism that stores reviews and ratings in the chain as NFT. This is interesting but sometimes these systems do not provide unfiltered or manipulated information, so the vast majority of information is censored, is it possible that your review system based on NFT allows us to have unfiltered, not manipulated and uncensored information? How will your system generate a reliable database so that the world of cryptocurrencies can trust?
The concept of reviews is something that has been lacking in the Cryptoverse. In fact, it is the need of the moment in the Cryptoverse. There has been a considerable increase in the number of Ponzi schemes and scams on the market. This has resulted in a considerable amount of losses on the part of investors. as Unireview reward for reviewing and rating any cryptocurrency available in the market? What parameters must a reviewer take into account to correctly rate a coin within Unireview? How do you know that these “reviewers” are trained enough to verify the quality of a project?
Unireview is a universal platform that will educate amateur and veteran investors to better understand the crypto space. The intention is to create a safe space for fans to learn more and for veteran investors to contribute their knowledge with descriptions and be rewarded in turn. What teaching tools does the Unireview platform have for teaching users? Will they provide live online courses? How does Unireview innovate?
The Unireview ecosystem recognizes the efforts of an exchange or a currency and aims to restore its intrinsic value to users. This can create potential growth opportunities for rapidly emerging changes. What are the parameters taken into account by Unireview to determine the reputation of a certain user? How does a user raise their reputation?
Unireview’s review mechanism would serve as an efficient watchdog that protects the doors of the Crypto network, making it a safe, secure and transparent space. At Unireview, our goal is to build a trusted review and rating platform that serves the community to improve the world of cryptocurrencies. What are the characteristics that Unireview has that allow it to be a reliable platform? What ensures that unireview is not another scam project?
Unireview is the world’s first platform where decentralized reviews meet rewards. It’s really interesting. What criteria must those reviews meet to be considered for rewards? What aspects are evaluated in each review? Will the number of words in a review matter when considering the rewards it will receive? What depends on the amount of rewards that each user receives within the Unireview platform?
In your Telegram Group, you have advised the community to stop any trading, buying, selling of $UREV on PancakeSwap. What is the reason for this notice? Did you notice a fake token on PancakeSwap with the same symbol or is there any issue regarding your token? Please let me know whether this notice is for a short period of time or $UREV will not be available on PancakeSwap again.
You have mentioned that users can reply to other reviewers’ comments as an appreciation/a critisism/an addition. When distributing rewards, do you consider a reply to a review as a review? It is clear that this system paves the way for the interactions among community members. What if this makes unwanted quarrels? Do you have a method to take policy actions against the members who create unpleasant situations? I am asking this question because I have seen many similar incidents regarding reviewing products/services.
With the Python Update 3.0v in Q2 of 2022, you have planned to introduce 10+ new features. What are those features about? Since an idea about those features helps us to understand the future of your project, could you please give a sneak peek of this milestone? How is you current progress of developing these new features?
As you mentioned, every user from the crypto fraternity is eligible to publish reviews and earn rewards within the Unireview platform. Is there a way to prove that the user’s review is honest? How do you prevent users from submitting dishonest and false reviews just to diminish the reputation of a cryptocurrency? Will users who are accused of posting fake reviews receive any penalties?
Unireview positions intself as a community-based social decetralized review and rating platform for Cryptocurrencies that helps address the issue at hand. Please talk about your community as in this case community is a major driving power for adequate and accurate ranking. How would you rank projects with the lack community interest or inadequate knowledge base? What about the new projects that make first steps in their long run?
Unireview talks about positioning itself or competing with the big boys in the Ethereum and POLYGON networks. Can you give us an update on the benefits that we will have according to these associations? How does your organization prepare to face these new challenges of continuing to grow, innovate, develop and thus position itself as one or the best platform?
Project review provide an informative basis for intending investors to have first hand information about a project and the previous experiences of users who have interacted with it. However, project reviews has been manipulated by various projects with untrue ratings, influenced trust score and fake submissions. How do you pick projects that you review and how do you select users that review and give candid opinions on these projects? How will Unireview create a social review that will represent a honest overview of project pros and cons? What reward or punishment strategies will you use to uphold the integrity of review made in your platform, and to ensure they are free of undue influence by any interested party?
Levels are understood to be defined by the number of UREV tokens held in the users’ wallet, which in turn determines the rewards within each level How many UREV tokens are allocated or open a pre-sale? How can they be obtained? UREV tokens? How much would be the minimum number of UREV tokens that a user can buy?
Based on the way your protocol is structured, every review will act as an NFT and once these reviews are made or uploaded onto blockchain, they become immutable and not editable. Also, a user is not allowed to review the same project twice. But looking at the crypto-sphere, you will agree with me that it is dynamic because a project that perform brilliantly at the first few weeks of launch, may fade away in few months. Hence, don’t you think there is a limitation in your review approach? Don’t you think it is necessary to create a window where a user who review a project high can go back and re-review his review to reflect the current state of a project with time, most especially if such project is no longer performing? How do you ensure your reviews will present a real-time representation of project status at all times?
Unireview will operate as a crypto social review platform based on Ethereum with further plan to integrate with polygon with time. Why did you prefer to be an Ethereum based project first considering the scalability limitations and high fees of this chain? Don’t you think the high fees on Ethereum will be more acceptable to large investors who have the resources for this and this could discourage an average crypto user from making daily review? What is your plan as it has to do with interoperation with highly scalable chains with lesser fees like Solana, AVAX, BSC and others?
Every reviewer will obtain a UREV token on the successful publication of a review but I found out that you are operating multiple reward tiers. These means even when everyone review thesame token, they are not incentivized thesame way. Can you provide the basis for your reward tier structure and how users are classified to earn reward? Does it have to do with how long a user have been reviewing or the positive feedback/acceptance the review has gathered after being made? What are the criteria you consider for a review to be accepted for m reward and how can a user who is in a lower review tier move to a premium reward tier which grants greater reward?
A potential problem I envisage for this kind of platform is that mischevious rivals can deliberately post negative reviews about a project similar to theirs to discredit the project. People who don’t have adequate knowledge about a project can also make inadequate posts just to get rewards. Also project owners themselves can sponsor positive review for their project on your platform.
How will you ensure only credible review will be published on your platform?
And you did mention that these reviews and ratings will be stored on-chain as NFTs. Does that means review cannot be updated or deleted either by you or the reviewer after it is published?
Unireview is a review and rating platform that lets you review and rate your favorite please what are the procedures involved in reviewing a project in your platform? What distinct mechanism have you put in place to store reviews in your platform? In the cryptospace today we have so many unfiltered and manipulated review of projects flying around, how do you plan to curb the scams and ponsi schemes running in the market? How will users be rewarded in your platform? Would you have a tier system for reviewing projects in your platform, and how much can a user earn in each tier? Thanks
Cryptocurrency review and rating platform play a central role in in helping investors learn about good projects to invest in, it creates value to buyers and sellers. Since Unireview will be a a review and rating platform, how do you plan to create a Trustworthy systems that can give investors the confidence they need to buy a relatively unknown crypto project? Do you have a feedback loop that will provide valuable information about any reviewed project? If reviews on your platform are all positive, many may conclude that Unireview can’t help them differentiate the good projects from the bad. What strategies have you put in place to provide a complete snapshot of all aspects of each project? Thanks
As stated, your review process will integrate a tier-based rewards mechanism, which will be defined by the amount of UREV tokens a reviewer holds. To ensure that the rewards process is adequately understood by potential reviewers, can you graciously provide us with extensive details on your various tiers, what amount of UREV tokens and rewards corresponds to each tier, and how can reviewers upgrade their tier levels? Also, it is stated that your DAO regulates and evaluate all reviews to ensure transparency. May we know how the DAO carries out this function, and how is the overall structure of your DAO?
As a central component to almost all review related activities as well as Unireview’s DAO related functionalities on the platform, can you thoroghly elaborate on the UREV token, what are it’s core utilities and how does it adequately provide a source of reputable compensation to platform activites? Also can you provide us with basic information on the tokenomics of $UREV, how much will be available and how will it be adequately allocated across all the core units and sectors of the project?
I like your platform, let’s say it’s a sort of crypto TrustPilot. To be listed on your platform, is it necessary to submit a request or do you take data from major platforms, such as CoinmarketCap?
I would like to know why you left Pancakeswap and BSC to adopt ETH and Polygon. From my point of view ETH is inaccessible if you invest sums under $ 500, while Polygon is very fast and cheap, but at the moment still snubbed, not everyone understands its potential. So what are you doing this migration for? do you believe that the fact that Polygon is accessible and with a solid future could attract more investors to UniReview?
I would like it to be possible to avoid connecting the wallet and maybe access the platform as a guest, moreover I would also like the possibility of interacting with users, so it would be a real social network. Do you have these implementations in mind for the future?
I also noticed various PHP errors when I go to look for some tokens outside the top 100 .. is the platform still in beta? It is not clear
With Unireview,we can enjoy and earn rewards while we rate and review crypto currencies on Unireview. So,what are the crypto currencies that are available to review with Unireview? How does review being rated to earn rewards in your platform? Is there a limit of review for each users or it review is unlimited?How does the reward of review being distributed and be reflected in our own account? Do we need to sign up in Unireview in order to review? What is the purpose of giving review? Lastly,while we give feedback or review to some crypto currencies ,what will be the impact it brings to the Crypto currency being reviewed? How does our review can reach out to the crypto currency being reviewed? Thank you
As I understood, By writing some comments on crypto currencies Users can earn $UREV tokens for their comments. Is that so simple the procedure as you said? Please give a well guidance to us for knowing it correctly? Definitely Crypto Projects will pay you for this service. How much will you incur from one project? What are the criterias will you be looking from them to insert in the Unireview list to be voted & commented by users?
With a 100 million of $UREV total supply, you have allocated 5%- DEXs, 10%- CEXs & others. So will you not launch initial seed round, IDO, Private sale events which are considered as main fundraising events? Do you hope to go for fair launch in Dexs & Cexs in future? And also you have allocated 10%- Buffer while you have already allocated 20%- adoption & marketing purposes. So Why is that? Lot of portion of total supply goes for Buffer & marketing. How about your transaction fees & deflationary system works? Do you have a strategy to control the inflation rate on $UREV token?
What kind of post are appreciated in the interview ecosystem? Who then gets to review what are posted in the platform? Because most post won’t be accepted, is there a mechanism that will be used to detect and delete unsolicited post in the ecosystem ?and how will they be able to fish out scamers who tries to extort from people through their post?
In your whitepaper, there are some parameters that determine user reputation & ranking within Unireview ecosystem. Can you tell me more about this reputation & ranking system? How does it work? Will user’s upvotes & downvotes directly affect on their reputation & ranking system? What are the privileges that a user can receive by a higher reputation & ranking?
based on the roadmap reviews what tools are considered to be used to tackle the demand of the users that are increasing simultaneously on the network? Because I read an article about the linkage of bsc and etherum and polygon not excluded, what kind of app should be created for users to experience a topnotch and stable ground for investments? Because I know every investor needs a healthy ecosystem for his trading business which will also help the project as well.
By creating a DAO in Unireview project, You decide to make a community wave for your project. Can you describe about the DAO system that you intend to deploy within Unireview ecosystem? Tell us what is the relation between $UREV & governance model? What are the things that users are capable to do in Unireview project for it’s growth?
Unireview project consists with scam monitoring system to prevent bot attacks & scam reviews. What will you do if a user will interact with scam reviews in Unireview project? Will their reputation be degraded? Please explain more about this scam monitoring system?
In first quarter of 2022, You will release Unireview launchpad including with public test launch & Mainnet launch. Please make us aware with more details about your upcoming launchpad? Will there be airdrop or giveaway events for those who will participate in Public testnet? What is the first project that you hope to launch through your launchpad? Can any project based on various blockchain networks use your launchpad to do their fundraising events?
Greetings Unireview, what system are you using to avoid possible cyber attacks and the growing scams? What ecosystem are they creating for emergencies and what would be the response capacity, to control and avoid scams before they are executed?
Knowing that Unireview is a decentralized social network based on reviews. I would like to know what events they have created with rewards in social networks, to publicize their project and bring more users to their platform? How important are the communities of other social networks for your project, how can they be part of and contribute to the growth of your community?
Which cryptocurrencies will be on the Unireview platform? Will there be currencies published on all blockchains, for example BSC, ETH, will you host all their altcoins? Users will earn rewards by commenting, so how will Unireview profit from it, what are the revenue models of Unireview?
Does Unireview pay royalties or other payments to cryptocurrency holders on its platform? So, do crypto money projects want you to be evaluated by contacting Unireview? So Unireview allows its users to rate cryptocurrencies, but does the evaluated cryptocurrency owner know about it?
I noticed that Unireview is a recently launched reviewing and rating platform for cryptocurrencies that aids in addressing issues in the crypto verse
Since it’s a recently launched project that aids in the addressing issues related to crypto currency.How can we trust this newly launched project?So far what are your success ratings?Is this project a long or short term project?I know this project already have partners, but do you intend partnering with more projects with bigger blockchain/crypto currency platform in the future?
Unireview is a community project that believes in addressing issues of the community andgiving it back for it’s betterment.Users in the crypto community can help each other by utilizing crypto currency reviews posted on the platform.I would like to know,does this project have a community governance system?can members of the Unireview community participate in community voting? Who Governs this community?
Tiers are defined by the amount of UREV tokens held in a users wallet which in turn determines the rewards with each tier.
My question is what’s the duration a UREV token stay in a users wallet to determine its rewards?How will a user know when his UREV token is matured to harvest?If a user does not harvest his UREV token will it be burned?
In terms of tools and statistics Unireview aims to create a TOP of users with the highest score i.e., with the highest level of credibility and a potential to attract more users to their forecasts. Do you plan to encourage those TOP users by implementing a sort of system of bonuses for them promoting UREV token at the same time? Thank you!
Let’s talk about security. Nowadays, it is almost impossible to protect users from any kind of scam or spam for 100%. It is especially developed within social networking where the impact of scam and spam prevail for frauders and thus might be dangerous for good projects playing for bad ones only. Please expand on Scam monitoring system that you’re working on? Is it a bot? What are its main features and differencies from other anto scam systems? Thank you!
As you mentioned in your Medium article, Most Investors rely on recommendations when it comes to investing. Unfortunately, manipulation and fake reviews have created a less credible field of review. Limiting and blocking this large mass of crypto, which is fed only by manipulation and deception, is one of the most important dangers that threaten all crypto stakeholders, but does the same danger not apply to the Unireview platform? How do you prevent fake reviews and ratings for a project to stand out, or fraudulent comments on a user’s reviews to rank up? Do you plan to use artificial intelligence to prevent such manipulative attempts?
Unireview is a recently launched community-based review and rating platform for Cryptocurrencies that helps address transparency related issues in cryptocurrency. Due to the lack of such platforms, investors are driven by social media phenomena. How do you plan to deliver and promote the Unireview platform to the investor mass following these phenomena? How will you incentivize people to make your platform more widely used?
What is your ultimate goal that you aim to reach in the world of ideas and crypto that started the Unireview project? While designing the Unireview project, did you determine your target audience as only new projects or will there be reviews and evaluations about existing projects?
On the 1st quarter of 2022,you plan to launch a First Unireview Summit. So,can you give us some advance idea and details about this Summit? What will be the goal and purpose of this Summit? As it will be the first Unireview Summit,who will be the expected participants of this Summit and do you have any collaboration to help you for the preparation and organize this Unireview Summit? If this will be the 1st Unireview Summit,so can we expect 2nd Summit coming from your platform in the future? Thank you
I was reading the steps to participate in the review and get some earnings and comes to me the following question … how will you guarantee that the users provide the closest review to reality for the selected cryptocurrencies? Should the users always provide a five stars rate for getting the rewards? Shouldn’t this actions promote scam projects in some cases?
Actually, Unireview seems to be the first of its kind review based decentralized social network, so could you tell us what are the most important aspects you’ll optimize in the future regarding the infrastructure? Also, how will you manage the social interactions and connections with the outside web? Will Unireview be linked to external platforms for collaborations?
You said reviews can’t be changed once they are posted,
but what if a user had an initial bad experience and rated it low???
What after rating a crypto low, the issue with the crypto get fixed, will you be able to change and update review to a higher review?
This is the first review to earn crypto site I’ve ever seen which is nice ,cause reviewing crypto coins is something that has not been able to be done before.. but
Do u have an official app where the review can be done?
Do u have a feature where one can edit and update thier reviews where thier experience with a coin changes?
U also mentioned a feature to comment on other review, do u consider commenting on other review as part of a review?
Do u also pay users for commenting on other reviews?
They may be competition between two or more coins which may raise the problem of fake review and rating to between coin.
How do you check if a review is fake and irrelevant??
Is there any feature to check if someone reviews a coin wrongly for thier own benefits?
Is there a feature to remove and delete a wrong reviews from your end?
You state on your website that we can earn UREV token prizes for contributing meaningful community content. Each review grants users UREV tokens. Could you please tell us more about this? Do you have any guidelines for people who want to generate valuable content? And where and how can we send our content? Thanks!:)
You stated that you care about your project supporters and provide them with exclusive advantages as they go through the reward tiers. The badges set the milestone achievers out from the rest of the throng. So, could you please inform us how to obtain Badges? What are the advantages of having badges? Does it have any effect on the award Tiers?
Unireview I think a unique name. Masks remind me of the current world conditions that are hit by covid-19, and my question Why choose Unireview for the project name (is there a history behind it)? and what is Unireview target in the near future, NFT or game project maybe?